Drawing for VIRTUAL VEHICLE

USPTO serial 79078631

VIRTUAL VEHICLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4040253Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 18, 2011
Examiner
DAHLING, KRISTIN M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with VIRTUAL VEHICLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEWART J. BELLUS

STEWART J. BELLUS COLLARD & ROE, P.C.1077 NORTHERN BLVD.ROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Scientific research and development in the field of automobile and rail technologies; scientific and technological services, namely, design, engineering and testing for new product development; industrial design and engineering services; software analysis services; industrial analysis, research and development services in the fields of mechanical, thermal, electrical and electronic engineering; design and development of computer hardware and software; computer systems analyses; physics research; construction drafting; technical project studies, namely, technical analysis to determine the thermodynamics of automobiles and rail vehicles, the noise of automobiles and rail vehicles, the vibration of automobiles and rail vehicles, the safety of automobiles and rail vehicles, the mechanical behavior of automobiles and rail vehicles, the dynamics of automobiles and rail vehicles, the fuel and emission efficiency of automobiles and rail vehicles, and the environmental sustainability of automobiles and rail vehicles; quality control for others; testing the roadworthiness of vehiclesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 24, 2023ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
May 14, 2022NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
May 14, 202271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Apr 27, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Sep 22, 2021ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Oct 23, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Oct 18, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Feb 6, 2020RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Sep 22, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Sep 22, 2017C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Sep 22, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Aug 30, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
May 4, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 17, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 17, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jan 18, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 18, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 2, 2011GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 2, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 13, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jul 13, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 13, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 29, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 24, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 22, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 2, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 2, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 2, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 20, 2011CEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED
Apr 20, 2011CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED
Nov 9, 2010CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Oct 18, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 15, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 1, 2010CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Sep 24, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 22, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 22, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 30, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 22, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 22, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 20, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 19, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 2, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Feb 24, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 19, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance