Drawing for MOBILAIR

USPTO serial 79078658

MOBILAIR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
AGOSTO, GISELLE MARIE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOBILAIR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Aimee L. Kaplan & Stewart J. Bellus

AIMEE L KAPLAN COLLARD & ROE PC1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Air compressors, namely, portable air compressorsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 13, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Mar 12, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 21, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Mar 30, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 8, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Mar 8, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 29, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Mar 8, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Mar 7, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Mar 7, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jan 14, 2012EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Oct 13, 2011RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Oct 13, 2011CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Sep 28, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 28, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 19, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Sep 19, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Sep 19, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Sep 19, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Sep 3, 2011GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 20, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jul 20, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 21, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 21, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 21, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 21, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 17, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 7, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 16, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Sep 3, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 3, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 3, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 3, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 3, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Apr 15, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 5, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 5, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 5, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 4, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Feb 24, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 24, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 22, 2010LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED
Feb 19, 2010SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance