USPTO serial 79078923
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stewart J. Bellus
Stewart J. Bellus COLLARD & ROE, P.C.1077 NORTHERN BLVD.Rosly, NY 11576UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Office furniture, namely, chairs, [ seats, sofas, benches, tables, occasional tables, ] office tables, [ tables for eating standing up, tiles for tables, shelves, ] cupboards [ chests, filing cabinets, cabinets for document files, writing desks, wastebaskets, coatstands ] | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2022 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 19, 2022 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 19, 2022 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 22, 2022 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 22, 2021 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2021 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 10, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2020 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Apr 30, 2020 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2020 | RHRD | RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 24, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 20, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2014 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | RHRD | RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2011 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 6, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 15, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 15, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 29, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 11, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 2, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |