USPTO serial 79079506
S STELUX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3873075Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 9, 2010
- Examiner
- LOTT, JASON E
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with S STELUX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Holly M. Ford Lewis
Holly M. Ford Lewis Oliff PLCP.O. Box 320850Alexandria, VA 22320-4850UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cleaning, polishing, degreasing and abrasive preparations, namely, abrasive metal particles and minerals in the form of balls, grains, and shots used for cleaning and treating metal, stone, glass, tile, and wood surfaces | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2021 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2021 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 9, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Oct 6, 2017 | RHRD | RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2015 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| May 22, 2015 | RHRD | RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 8, 2011 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 24, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 22, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 27, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |