USPTO serial 79079728
BRETAGNE GOURMET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRETAGNE GOURMET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat, fish, poultry from Bretagne, France and game; meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, compotes; eggs, milk and dairy products that are cheese, butter, milk, yogurt, cream; edible oils and fats except olive oils; above all goods are originated from Bretagne in France | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, flour from Bretagne, France and other cereal preparations that are cornflakes, wheatflakes, bread, pastry and confectionery, edible ices; honey; salt, mustard; vinegar, sauces that are condiments; spices; sandwiches, pizzas; pancakes; cookies and biscuits; cakes; rusks; sugar confectionery; chocolate; above all goods are originated from Bretagne in France | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Advertising, business management; business administration; business organisation and management consulting; arranging of exhibitions for business or advertising purposes; public relations | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2021 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 22, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2011 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 7, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 28, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |