USPTO serial 79080702
ILA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOONE, JOHN C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ILA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Falkin
Mark Falkin Falkin + Sachse PLLC4107 Medical ParkwaySuite 207Austin, TX 78756Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetic creams for skin care; Cosmetic preparations for skin care; Non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, creams, lotions, gels, toners, cleaners, moisturizers, body balms, body oils, face oils, soaps, and peels; Face and body creams; Body and beauty care cosmetics; Beauty creams for body care; Cleansing milk; Beauty milks; Bath oils and bath salts; Body scrub | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2020 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Dec 8, 2013 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 6, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2013 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 8, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 26, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 25, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 11, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 2, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |