CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for IRS

USPTO serial 79083417

IRS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 602
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HALMEN, KATHERINE E
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with IRS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Shampoos; hair products; hair gel; hair care agents; hair spray; hair styling aids; hair styling waxes; soap; cosmetics; skincare cosmetics; bath products, not medicated; body care products (non-medicated)ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 12, 2020RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 6, 2019CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 25, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 19, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 18, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 27, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 22, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 22, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 7, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 7, 2011OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 22, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 22, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 28, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 27, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 27, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 27, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 26, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 6, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 2, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance