Drawing for ACOTEC

USPTO serial 79084128

ACOTEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4065206Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 6, 2011
Examiner
DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
Law office

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ACOTEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stewart J. Bellus

Stewart J. Bellus COLLARD & ROE, P.C.1077 NORTHERN BLVD.ROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007[ Drive trains for wind generator plants; machine couplings, being machine parts for wind generator plants; torsional vibration dampers, being machine parts for wind generator plants; transmission components in the nature of transmission shafts and engine mounts, all being machine parts for wind generator plants; ] machine parts in the nature of transmission components being torsional vibration dampers, machine couplings, transmission shafts, not for land vehiclesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
012Land vehicle parts, namely, drive trains, torsional vibration dampers, transmission, flexible and torsional couplings for drive shafts, and transmission components being transmission shafts and engine mounts, all for vehiclesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
042[ Technical measurement evaluations in the field of wind-energy engineering, namely, testing and analyzing of measured data relating to the functionality of transmission lines used for wind power plants; technical measurement evaluations in the field of the operability of land vehicle and diesel objects, namely, the testing and analyzing of measured data relating to the efficiency of land vehicle and diesel engines ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 10, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
May 10, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 6, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Apr 19, 2019INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Mar 6, 2019INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Mar 6, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Feb 27, 2019INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jun 27, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jun 27, 201871.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED
Jun 25, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jun 5, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Feb 16, 2018CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Aug 17, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 30, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 30, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Mar 6, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 6, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 6, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 20, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 31, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 31, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 31, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 13, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 11, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Aug 11, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Aug 10, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 10, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 10, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jul 24, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 24, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 19, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Jul 19, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jul 19, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jul 19, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jan 24, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 24, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 5, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 5, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 5, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 8, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 8, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 8, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 22, 2010CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Nov 19, 2010CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Sep 3, 2010CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Sep 2, 2010CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Aug 28, 2010RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 2, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Aug 2, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jul 31, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jul 30, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jul 26, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 23, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 22, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance