USPTO serial 79086367
MASCIARELLI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MASCIARELLI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
AZIENDA AGRICOLA MASCIARELLI S.A.S. DI MASCIARELLI M. & C.
IT
Other trademarks owned by AZIENDA AGRICOLA MASCIARELLI S.A.S. DI MASCIARELLI M. & C.
AZIENDA AGRICOLA MASCIARELLI S.A.S. DI MASCIARELLI M. & C.
IT
Other trademarks owned by AZIENDA AGRICOLA MASCIARELLI S.A.S. DI MASCIARELLI M. & C.
Masciarelli Tenute Agricole S.r.l.
IT
Other trademarks owned by Masciarelli Tenute Agricole S.r.l.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages except beers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AZIENDA AGRICOLA MASCIARELLI S.A.S. DI MASCIARELLI M. & C.
- Other trademarks owned by AZIENDA AGRICOLA MASCIARELLI S.A.S. DI MASCIARELLI M. & C.
- Other trademarks owned by Masciarelli Tenute Agricole S.r.l.
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named MASCIARELLI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 2, 2018 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 11, 2018 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2014 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 12, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 29, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 20, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 29, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |