USPTO serial 79086476
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
NL
NL
NL
NL
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, jeans, non-denim pants and shorts, t-shirts, shirts, skirts, sweaters, vests, jackets, blazers, swimwear, blouses and underwear; footwear; headgear, namely, hats and caps | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of development, creation, production and post-production services of multimedia entertainment | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2023 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2023 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2023 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 10, 2023 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 10, 2023 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 24, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2020 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 21, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 12, 2019 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Dec 14, 2018 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 4, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 8, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 18, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 31, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 11, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 14, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 4, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 20, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 25, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 17, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |