USPTO serial 79087134
RAPUNZEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, JULIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RAPUNZEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | False nails and false eyelashes; adhesives for false nails, false eyelashes, hair for hair extensions, false hair, false hair braids, wigs and toupees; nail care preparations, nail varnish; cosmetic preparations for eyelashes, eyebrow cosmetics, eyebrow pencils; waving preparations for the hair, neutralizers for permanent waving; hair dyeing preparations, hair waving preparations; depilatories and depilatory preparations therefor; make-up, cosmetics, make-up preparations, cosmetic kits, cosmetic pencils; makeup removing preparations; cotton wool and cotton sticks for cosmetic purposes; pomades for cosmetic purposes, cosmetic creams; greases for cosmetic purposes; astringents for cosmetic use; cosmetic dyes; lipsticks, powders; beauty masks; shampoo; hydrogen peroxide for cosmetic purposes, bleaching preparations for cosmetic purposes; skin whitening creams; cosmetic preparations for skin care; cleansing preparations, cleansing milk for toilet purposes; suntan lotions and sun-tanning preparations; lotions for cosmetic purposes; tissues impregnated with cosmetic lotion; pumice stone for personal use; petroleum jelly for cosmetic purposes; cosmetic preparations for baths, bath salts not for medical purposes; perfumery, perfumes; herbal bases for perfumes; perfume oils, perfume essences; essential oils, ethereal essences, ethereal oils; soaps and deodorants for personal use | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 008 | Electric and non electric depilation appliances; hair clippers for personal use; non-electric hand implements for hair curling; manicure sets and electric manicure sets; pedicure sets; stropping instruments | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 026 | False hair, false hair and human hair for hair extensions, hair braids, false hair braids, wigs, toupees; hair decorations, bows for the hair, hair ribbons, hair grips, hair pins, hair nets; hair curling pins, non electric hair curlers | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ida Backlund, Stefan Lövgren
- Other trademarks owned by Rapunzel of Sweden AB
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Similar marks named RAPUNZEL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2020 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 4, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2013 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 16, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 26, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2010 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 23, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 22, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |