USPTO serial 79087739
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Surry Hills NSW 2010, AU
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raj Abhyanker
RAJ ABHYANKER LEGALFORCE RAPC WORLDWIDE, P.C.446 E SOUTHERN AVETEMPE, AZ 85282UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs, namely, downloadable and on-line computer programs and platforms for social networking featuring music; digital music downloadable from the Internet; digital music downloadable from MP3 web sites on the Internet; downloadable music files; downloadable podcasts in the field of music; downloadable ring tones for mobile phones; downloadable electronic publications in the nature of books and journals in the field of music and social networking; digitally stored images, namely, downloadable images in the fields of entertainment and sports; digitally stored photographs, namely, downloadable images in the fields of entertainment and sports; communication software, namely, downloadable and on-line computer programs and platforms for social networking featuring music | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Marketing and advertising services, namely, marketing and advertising through social networking platforms featuring music; organisation and management of incentive and sales promotion programmes in the nature of frequent buyer programmes, namely, providing incentive award programs for customers through issuance and processing of loyalty points for on-line and retail purchase of company's goods and services; organisation and management of incentive programmes, namely, arranging and conducting incentive reward programs to promote the sale of music products and services | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Entertainment in the nature of websites and on-line software platforms featuring music, music information, and social networking; entertainment information; ticket reservation and booking services for entertainment, sporting and cultural events provided in relation to a customer loyalty or frequent buyer program; organisation and conducting of dance, music and other entertainment festivals; organisation of entertainment events for cultural purposes; organisation of exhibitions for entertainment purposes; provision of entertainment services via an online forum, namely, providing on-line computer games; concert ticket reservation services; reservation services for concert tickets; reservation services for show tickets; reservation services for sporting tickets; reservation services for theatre tickets; ticket agency services for entertainment events; ticket agency services for entertainment events, namely, sporting events; entertainment services, namely, providing non-downloadable playback of digital music via the Internet; providing online non-downloadable electronic publications in the nature of books and journals in the field of music and social networking; online publication of journals or diaries in the nature of blogs | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 12, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2014 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 9, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 8, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 13, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2010 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 8, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |