Drawing for ECOLOAD

USPTO serial 79088447

ECOLOAD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4008195Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 9, 2011
Examiner
BIBB, SCOTT
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECOLOAD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard M. LaBarge

Richard M. LaBarge MARSHALL GERSTEIN & BORUN LLP233 SOUTH WACKER DRIVESUITE 6300CHICAGO, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Power operated machines and apparatus for the digging, excavating, mechanical handling, lifting, loading and transporting of earth, minerals, soil, crops and of like materials, namely, agricultural machines, namely, telescopic handlers and wheeled loaders; earthmoving machines, namely, loaders, backhoes, and excavators; dump trucks; power-operated lifting and moving equipment, namely, forklifts and telehandlers; front-end loaders; skid-steerloaders; asphalt paving machines, namely, asphalt rollers; compacting and vibrating machines and equipment, namely, earth-compacting machines, including vibratory plate compactors; road rollers used with asphalt paving; asphalt and concrete cutting machines; parts and fittings included in this class for all the aforesaid goodsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 10, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Oct 10, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Aug 9, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jun 12, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Jun 12, 2017C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Jun 12, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Mar 3, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Apr 13, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 21, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Mar 21, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Nov 9, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 9, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 24, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 4, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 4, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 4, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 21, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 17, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 17, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 17, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 9, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 25, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 25, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 20, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 18, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 10, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 10, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jan 10, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jan 9, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 12, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Nov 8, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 6, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance