USPTO serial 79088742
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Pushchairs; golf trolleys; multitrack electric vehicles, especially electric wheel chairs and electric vehicles for elderly persons and hampered persons; parts of the aforesaid goods, as far as included in this class | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2022 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2021 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2020 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 18, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2010 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 25, 2010 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 11, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |