Drawing for DAC-MAGIC

USPTO serial 79088901

DAC-MAGIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4017873Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 30, 2011
Examiner
ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with DAC-MAGIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karen Lim

Karen Lim Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.151 West 42nd Street, 17th FloorNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Iron, namely, alloyed iron; steelACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 2023ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 28, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 14, 2021NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 14, 202171AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 13, 2021EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2021PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Apr 19, 2021APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 2, 2021ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2020RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 13, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Jul 13, 2017C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 10, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 13, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 27, 2012FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 11, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 11, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 30, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 4, 2011GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 30, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 14, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 25, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 25, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 25, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 10, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 2, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 27, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 27, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 23, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 11, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 12, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 24, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 24, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 22, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 21, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 23, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 19, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2010LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance