Drawing for FIIISH INSTINCT INNOVATION INTELLIGENCE

USPTO serial 79089265

FIIISH INSTINCT INNOVATION INTELLIGENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4133616Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 1, 2012
Examiner
BELL, MARLENE D
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIIISH INSTINCT INNOVATION INTELLIGENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John S. Egbert

JOHN S. EGBERT EGBERT LAW OFFICES, PLLC412 MAIN ST., 7TH FLOORHOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Fishing tackle; artificial fishing bait; rods for fishing; fly rods for fishing; fishing tackle, namely, bite detectors; hand-held landing nets for fishing; nets for fishing; floats for fishing; fish hooks; lines for fishing; scented and unscented lures for fishing; reels for fishing; fishing equipment, namely, creels; fishing sinkers; stands and cases for fishing rodsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Apr 17, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 30, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Aug 28, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Aug 28, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Aug 7, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Dec 7, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
May 1, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
May 22, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 3, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 17, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 5, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 4, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 1, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 25, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
May 1, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 25, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 25, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 14, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Feb 14, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 25, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jan 25, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 25, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jan 11, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 26, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 13, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 13, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 13, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 2, 2011GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Aug 2, 2011GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Aug 2, 2011CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED
Jul 13, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 13, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 11, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 24, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 22, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 19, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 3, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 3, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Dec 29, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 28, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 4, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Nov 30, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 29, 2010LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 25, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance