Drawing for VYDRO

USPTO serial 79089332

VYDRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4065241Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 6, 2011
Examiner
JUN, WON KYUNG WENDY
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with VYDRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mainak H. Mehta

Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B. StreetSuite 2200San Diego, CA 92101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical products for use in the agriculture, horticulture and forestry, namely, manures and fertilizers; polymer-based substrates for soil-free growing; polymerbased substrates for growing and cultivating plants, crops and other vegetable lifeACTIVE
017Semi-finished hydrophilic polyurethane foam in the form of slabs, blocks, strips, rods, pipes and flakes for use as media for growing and cultivating plants, crops and other vegetable lifeACTIVE
019Non-metallic building materials for building green roofs, green walls, vertical gardens, grassing roofs and cultivating roof gardens, namely, polymer-based foam; non-metallic building materials for use in controlling, managing and draining moisture and water on roofs, namely, polymer-foam slabs, blocks, strips, flakes and pipes for drainage, plastic conduit for drainage, drain bases and gratesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 6, 2026RHRDRESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED
Dec 17, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Sep 2, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 19, 2022NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
May 19, 202271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
May 19, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Nov 4, 2021ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jun 27, 2021ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Dec 6, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Oct 30, 2020RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
May 17, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
May 17, 2017C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
May 17, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Dec 27, 2016ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Dec 6, 2016REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Sep 24, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 24, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 24, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Aug 10, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 24, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 24, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
May 30, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 30, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Mar 6, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 6, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 6, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 20, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Sep 20, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 31, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 31, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 13, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 9, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 6, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 6, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 6, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Aug 6, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jul 29, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 28, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 28, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Jul 18, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Jul 18, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 18, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 13, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 13, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 30, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 20, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 16, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 16, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 11, 2011CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jan 15, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 21, 2010RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 21, 2010RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Dec 21, 2010RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 20, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 4, 2010MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Nov 30, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 29, 2010LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED
Nov 25, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance