USPTO serial 79089827
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marcus P. Dolce
Marcus P. Dolce Flynn Thiel, P.C.2026 Rambling RoadKalamazoo, MI 49008-1631UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | [ Packaging machines * for the textile industry *; ] [ vacuum packaging machines; conveying machines; ] [ filling machines; plastic film welding machines; plastic film sealing machines; deformation machines for forming master molds from plastic materials; ] regulators being parts of machines; [ carton sealing machines for industrial purpose; electric welding machines; welding bars as machine components for plastic film welding machines; ] sealing bars as machine parts for plastic film sealing machines [ ; and parts of all aforementioned goods ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Temperature controllers for heat sealing equipment for plastic film and package sealing, namely, electronic controllers, transformers, timers and performance monitoring equipment, namely, testing and measuring equipment for use in testing the performance and efficiency of heat sealing machinery, all for monitoring the accuracy of operating functionalities for heat sealing machinery; [ electric wires; ; ] electric installations for the remote control of industrial operations; electrical apparatus for regulating electric current; electrical heat sealing apparatus and machines for sealing plastic, paper, foil, cellophane packaging and parts therefore; apparatus for heat sealing plastics and films; thermostats; and parts of all aforementioned goods | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 25, 2025 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2025 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Dec 11, 2025 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2023 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2023 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2023 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 25, 2023 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 25, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2022 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 24, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 22, 2021 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 13, 2017 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2017 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 3, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 31, 2017 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2014 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 14, 2013 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2013 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2012 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 22, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 14, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 14, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 29, 2011 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 15, 2011 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 17, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 19, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 7, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 4, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 4, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 4, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |