Drawing for EV PLUG ALLIANCE

USPTO serial 79090666

EV PLUG ALLIANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EV PLUG ALLIANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Plugs, sockets for plugs and cords for recharging electric vehicles, hybrid electric vehicles or rechargeable electric batteriesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
042Running compatibility tests for plugs for recharging electric vehicles and rechargeable vehicles; allocating compliance labels for the goods cited in class 9SECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Oct 3, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 24, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 9, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 20, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 19, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 30, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 30, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 19, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 19, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 29, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 10, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 8, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jan 7, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jan 7, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jan 6, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 4, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 30, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance