Drawing for GRETCHEN

USPTO serial 79090711

GRETCHEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4148301Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 29, 2012
Examiner
LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with GRETCHEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas D. Wells

Nicholas D. Wells Legends Law Group, PLLC330 Main St.Kaysville, UT 84037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Women's handbags, men's handbags, reusable shopping bags not of plastic or paper; holdalls, cosmetic purses, namely, cosmetic bags sold empty; document bags, namely, briefcases for documents; document cases, briefcases, [ hat boxes for travel not of paper or cardboard; trunks, ] valises, wallets, pouches not of paper or plastic for holding make-up, keys and other personal items; purses, credit card cases of leather, identity card cases of leather [, travel cases of leather, ] leather key chains; leather key cases; [ leather business card cases; lighter covers made of leather; leather boxes; leather jewelry roll bags ]ACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 16, 2023INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Aug 7, 2023XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Aug 7, 2023XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Jul 10, 2023INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Nov 10, 2022NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Nov 10, 202271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Nov 8, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
May 25, 2022ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
May 29, 2021REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Nov 19, 2020RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
May 21, 2018NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
May 21, 2018C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
May 18, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
May 15, 2018ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Feb 13, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 2, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Mar 10, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 16, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 16, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Nov 24, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 29, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 29, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 13, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 22, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 22, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 22, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 7, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 29, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 17, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 17, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 17, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Aug 16, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 16, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 21, 2011ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 21, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 12, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 8, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 29, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 10, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 10, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jan 10, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jan 9, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jan 4, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 4, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Dec 30, 2010REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance