USPTO serial 79090908
HERBAGREEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HALMEN, KATHERINE E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HERBAGREEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry L. Kelmachter
Barry L. Kelmachter Bachman & LaPointe, P.C.900 Chapel StreetSuite 1201New Haven, CT 06510Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Manures; foliar fertilizer; soil conditioners for agricultural, domestic or horticultural use; soil improving agents for promoting the quick, strong and even growth of plants and strengthening of their immune systems | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Technical projects namely conducting studies of agricultural products for increasing the growth of crops in an environmentally safe way; providing specialist technical knowledge in the field of agricultural products for increasing the growth of crops to franchises | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2022 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2022 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2021 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 29, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 3, 2011 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |