Drawing for SUPERGLISS

USPTO serial 79092774

SUPERGLISS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4062035Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 29, 2011
Examiner
LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUPERGLISS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David W. Grace

David W. Grace Loeb & Loeb LLP10100 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 2200Los Angeles, CA 90067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Hair removers, namely, electric or non-electric depilatory appliances; electric or non-electric razors; electric or non-electric hair clippers; manicure and pedicure setsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
009Electric flat irons for laundry and component parts for electric flat irons for laundry; electric hair smoothing apparatus, namely, electric hair straightener; hair curling apparatus, namely, electric hair curling ironsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
011Steam generating irons for household use; clothes dryers; electric hair dryers; electric radiators for household use; electric fans for household use; air purifiers using ionization technology for household use; electric fans for household use; air purifiers using ionization technology for household use; electric room deodorizing units; air conditioners; humidifiers and dehumidifiers for household useSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jul 18, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 17, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Mar 13, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Mar 13, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Mar 6, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jul 6, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jul 3, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
May 25, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 16, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 16, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Feb 29, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 29, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 20, 2011GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 13, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 24, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 24, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 24, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 9, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 4, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 4, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 4, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 3, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 26, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 9, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 23, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 23, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 22, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 21, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 1, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Feb 25, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 24, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance