USPTO serial 79093159
DURU VITAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4133637Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 1, 2012
- Examiner
- LORENZO, KATHLEEN H
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DURU VITAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DURU BULGUR GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by DURU BULGUR GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
DURU BULGUR GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by DURU BULGUR GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
DURU BULGUR GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by DURU BULGUR GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bradley D. Crose
Bradley D. Crose Crose Law LLC112 Northbrooke TraceWoodstock, GA 30188UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat; fish; meat of poultry and game; processed meat; dried beans; ready-made soups; bouillons; processed olives; olive paste; milk and milk products, namely, butter; edible vegetable oils; dried, preserved, frozen, cooked, smoked, pickled fruits and vegetables; processed nuts; hazelnut and peanut spread; crushed sesame seeds, namely, tahini; eggs, powdered eggs, potato crisps | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Coffee; cocoa; coffee or cocoa-based beverages; chocolate-based beverages; macaroni; meat pies; vermicelli; pastry and bakery goods; honey; bee glue, namely, propolis for human consumption; flavourings for foods; yeast; baking-powder; flour-milling products and preparations, namely, processed wheat ; flour; processed semolina; food starch; sugar; lump sugar; powdered sugar; teas; iced teas,; confectioneries made of sugar; chocolates; biscuits; crackers; wafers; chewing-gums; ice creams; edible ices; salt; processed cereal and their products, namely, breakfast cereal; carbohydrate-based food products for non-medical purposes, namely, bulgar and popcorn | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DURU BULGUR GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by DURU BULGUR GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by DURU BULGUR GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named DURU VITAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2023 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2023 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2023 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 18, 2023 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 18, 2022 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 1, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 14, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 25, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 14, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 25, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 14, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |