USPTO serial 79093206
JOULIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4127338Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 17, 2012
- Examiner
- CHANG, KATHERINE S
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JOULIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason R. Lee
Jason R. Lee The Trademark Firm PLLC2370 W SR 89ASuite 11-225Sedona, AZ 86336Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Apparatus for lighting, heating, steam generation, cooking, drying, ventilating, water supply and sanitary purposes, namely, lighting installations, hot water heaters, HVAC ventilator units, lighting tubes, heat pumps, sanitary fittings, namely, plumbing fittings in the nature of valves, cocks and baffles; shower and bath installations; shower and bath fittings, namely, plumbing fittings in the nature of traps, sink strainers and faucet aerators; inlays for shower installations in the nature of shower trays; heat exchange units for use in the production of steam, for use in cooking and for use in refrigeration | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | [ Construction of sanitary installations, kitchens, water supply and heat exchange installations; repair of sanitary products and apparatuses, namely, showers and baths for use in the production of steam, for use in cooking and for use in refrigeration; repair of kitchen apparatuses and heat exchange units; installation of sanitary apparatuses, kitchen appliances and heat exchange units ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2023 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2023 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2023 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 28, 2023 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 28, 2022 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 17, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 3, 2020 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 21, 2020 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 21, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 11, 2020 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2018 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Apr 17, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2014 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2014 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 29, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 25, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2012 | WDRL | OTQR WITHDRAWAL FROM PUBLICATION | — |
| May 29, 2012 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 18, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 13, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 16, 2012 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 20, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 5, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 2, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 1, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 29, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 23, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |