USPTO serial 79093209
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Starlinger & Co Gesellschaft m.b.H.
AT
Other trademarks owned by Starlinger & Co Gesellschaft m.b.H.
Starlinger & Co Gesellschaft m.b.H.
AT
Other trademarks owned by Starlinger & Co Gesellschaft m.b.H.
Starlinger & Co Gesellschaft m.b.H.
Wien, AT
Other trademarks owned by Starlinger & Co Gesellschaft m.b.H.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sheryl De Luca
Sheryl De Luca Nixon & Vanderhye, P.C.901 N. Glebe Road11th FloorArlington, VA 22203| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | [ Machines, namely, machines for manufacturing and dispensing packing material, plastic films, flat film tapes of plastic; Extrusion machines for the production of flat film tapes made of plastic; Extrusion installations for manufacturing flat film tapes of plastic; Band stretching machines for stretching tapes made of plastic film; Bobbin winding machines; Circular automatic looms for the production of circular woven fabrics of flat film tapes of plastics; Perforating machines for plastic woven fabrics and films; Printing machines for commercial or industrial use; Finishing machines for cutting to length, folding, sewing and sealing plastic woven fabrics and films; Machines and installations therefor for manufacturing sacks; Machines and installations therefor for manufacturing plastic woven fabric sacks; Bagging installations, namely, machines for filling, weighing and sealing sacks and bags; ] Machines for processing plastics and plastic waste for use in recycling plastic waste which is then further used as a basic plastic product for various applications; Recycling installations in the nature of machinery for the mechanical recycling of plastics for use in recycling plastic waste which is then further used as a basic plastic product for various applications; machines for crushing plastic waste for use in recycling plastic waste which is then further used as a basic plastic product for various applications; Machines for granulating molten plastic for use in recycling plastic waste which is then further used as a basic plastic product for various applications; Machines for filtering molten plastic for use in recycling plastic waste which is then further used as a basic plastic product for various applications; Installations in the nature of machines for the heat treatment of plastics for use in recycling plastic waste which is then further used as a basic plastic product for various applications; Installations in the nature of machines for the solid phase polycondensation of plastics, plant installation for the solid-state polycondensation of synthetic materials, namely, machines for the solid-state polycondensation of plastics consisting of heated or non-heated containers being parts of said machines, vacuum pumps, conveyors and conveyor belts, heating and cooling means for granules, namely, heat exchangers being parts of machines, air-cooled condensers, pumps for cooling engines for use in recycling plastic waste which is then further used as a basic plastic product for various applications [ ; Intrusion machines, namely, intrusion moulding machines for use in recycling plastic waste which is then further used as a basic plastic product for various applications ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | [ Plastic bags for packaging, including reusable and synthetic plastic bags for packaging ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 022 | [ Sacks and bags of synthetic textile, for the transport and storage of materials in bulk ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2024 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| May 14, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2024 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| May 14, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2023 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2023 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 11, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 25, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2019 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 27, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 21, 2018 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 31, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 31, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 25, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 29, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 1, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 14, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 7, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 7, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 14, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 3, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2011 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |