Drawing for DIFENQI

USPTO serial 79093379

DIFENQI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SMIGA, HOWARD
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIFENQI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Hydrants; hot water heating installations; pipe mouth for water heating equipment; pipe joint for water heating equipment; pipes (parts of sanitary installations); water intake apparatus; water distribution installations; bath fittings; sanitary apparatus and installationsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 3, 2021UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Jun 13, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jun 12, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Sep 21, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 16, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 4, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 12, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 12, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 14, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 27, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 25, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 12, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 12, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 3, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 12, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Mar 11, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 11, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 10, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 9, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 8, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 3, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance