USPTO serial 79093388
N U F I B R A
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4262881Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 25, 2012
- Examiner
- LEIPZIG, MARC J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with N U F I B R A?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
55425 Waldalgesheim, DE
55425 Waldalgesheim, DE
55425 Waldalgesheim, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Darren J. Jones
DARREN J. JONES LOWE GRAHAM JONES701 5TH AVE STE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98104-7009UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat, fish, poultry and game; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, compotes; eggs, milk and milk products, excluding ice cream, ice-milk and frozen yogurt; edible oils and fats; fruit-based, meat-based, soy-based, potato-based, nut-based snack foods; packaged meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables potato products, namely, mashed potatoes, French fries; soups, soup extracts, soup concentrates in form of premixes; ready-to-eat soups | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Rice; flour and preparations made from cereals, namely, cereal-based snack food, cornflakes, popcorn, dough, in particular pizza dough; bread, pastry and confectionery, made of sugar; ices and ice-creams; frozen confections, namely, ices; frozen foods, namely, grain and bread-based appetizers, hors d'oeuvres, and canapés; honey, sauces; prepared meals consisting primarily of pasta; pasta and noodles | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Non-alcoholic aperitifs, non-alcoholic cocktails, non-alcoholic fruit extracts used in the preparation of beverages, non-alcoholic fruit drinks, non-alcoholic malt beverages, non-alcoholic fruit juices, honey-based non-alcoholic beverages; apple juice beverages, powders and pastilles used in the preparation of fruit-based and sports beverages, namely, for effervescing said beverages; soft drinks, namely, non-alcoholic peanut milk; preparations for making mineral water, preparations for making aerated water, essences, not in the nature of essential oils, for use in making beverages in the nature of soft drinks, mineral water and liqueurs, non-alcoholic fruit nectars, fruit juices, vegetable juices, isotonic drinks, aerated waters, lemonades, syrups for making lemonade, mineral waters, unfermented must, preparations for making beverages, namely, fruit drinks and soft drinks, syrups for beverages, soda water, table waters, tomato juice, drinking water | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pro Ges Food GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Pro Ges Food GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Pro Ges Food GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named N U F I B R A
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 26, 2020 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 26, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 25, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 15, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 25, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 31, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 19, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 31, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 31, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 20, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 19, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 22, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |