USPTO serial 79093484
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The Newbridge Cutlery Company t/a Newbridge Silverware
IE
Other trademarks owned by The Newbridge Cutlery Company t/a Newbridge Silverware
The Newbridge Cutlery Company t/a Newbridge Silverware
IE
Other trademarks owned by The Newbridge Cutlery Company t/a Newbridge Silverware
The Newbridge Cutlery Company t/a Newbridge Silverware
IE
Other trademarks owned by The Newbridge Cutlery Company t/a Newbridge Silverware
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kanishka Agarwala
KANISHKA AGARWALA ANDERSON KILL & OLICK PC1251 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10020UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Cutlery, namely, forks, spoons, and knives; salad forks; pastry forks; teaspoons; soup spoons; desert spoons; steak knives; fish knives; carving knives; razors | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 014 | Jewelry; precious stones; horological and chronometric instruments, namely, clocks and watches; bracelets; necklaces; rings; cuff links; tie pins; earrings; costume jewelry; silver plated jewelry; key rings made of or plated with precious metals; silver plated ornaments, namely, brooches; personal ornaments made of or plated with precious metals | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | Silver-plated business card holders; silver-plated pen holders; silver-plated pens | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Household or kitchen utensils and containers, namely, spatulas, fish slices in the nature of spatulas, ladles, cooking tongs, colanders, cruet sets, toast racks, flasks; combs and sponges for household purposes; bottle openers; bowls; non-electric candelabras; candlesticks; cocktail shakers; cocktail utensils, namely, ice buckets, corkscrews; cooking pots; saucepans; cups; mugs; saucers; plates; side plates; milk jugs; sugar bowls; drinking glasses; vases; napkin rings; salt shakers; pepper mills | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 24, 2021 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 8, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 4, 2016 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | RMDT | EXAMINERS REQUEST FOR REMAND TO TTAB | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 19, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 23, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 3, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 17, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |