Drawing for SPORTS FRIDGE

USPTO serial 79093769

SPORTS FRIDGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LEIPZIG, MARC J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPORTS FRIDGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julie E. Kretzschmer

Julie E. Kretzschmer Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP39400 Woodward Avenue, Suite 101Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304-5151UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Apparatus for cooling and freezing, namely, refrigerators; freezers; refrigerators and freezers, sold as a unit, refrigerators encased in a fibreglass surround that holds sporting memorabilia, refrigerating cabinets; portable electric ice boxes; thermoelectric cooler for food and beveragesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 3, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Nov 2, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Aug 17, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 30, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 30, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 31, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 15, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 15, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 30, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 30, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 2, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 2, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 2, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 2, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 28, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 9, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 25, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 25, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 28, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 11, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 11, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 11, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 10, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2011RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW
May 3, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 2, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 15, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Mar 11, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 10, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance