Drawing for GREENFLO

USPTO serial 79093893

GREENFLO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4085855Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 17, 2012
Examiner
CORWIN, CHARLOTTE K
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GREENFLO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arlene D. Hanks

Arlene D. Hanks Moore & Van Allen PLLC3015 Carrington Mill BoulevardSuite 400Morrisville, NC 27560

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals used in industry, namely, chemicals for filtering gaseous contents of air; chemicals used in industry, namely, absorbent chemicals for filtering airSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
007Component parts for air filters for mechanical purposes, namely, cartridges; industrial filter press machines; air filters for mechanical purposes; air filters as parts of engines; air filters as parts of machines, namely, air filters for mixing machines; filters for cleaning cooling air for engines; dust exhausting installations for industrial purposes; dust collector machinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
011Air filters for domestic use, air filters for industrial installations and air conditioning filters and component parts thereof; air filters as parts of household or industrial installations; air filtering installations; air purifying apparatus and machines; air sterilizers; air conditioning apparatus; air dryers, namely, portable electric warm air dryers; ventilation installations and apparatusSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Nov 2, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 7, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
May 16, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
May 16, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Apr 24, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Aug 24, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jul 20, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 17, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Nov 17, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 25, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 4, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 3, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Apr 17, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 17, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 1, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Nov 1, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 27, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 27, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 15, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 15, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 15, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 15, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 17, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 30, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 30, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 30, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 29, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 22, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Mar 16, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 10, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance