USPTO serial 79093909
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Industrial chemicals, particularly chemical and physical acting additives for lubricants, lubricating greases, industrial oils and for motor oils, gear oils, compressor oils and hydraulic oils, as well as additives for fuels, particularly gasoline and diesel oil; chemical additives for liquids for cooling engines; chemical preparations for manufacturing of coolants, cooling lubricants and anti-corrosive preparations; water-miscible coolants and non-water-miscible coolants, as well as cooling lubricants for grinding (for metal processing); cryogenic preparations | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 002 | Anti-corrosive preparations; dual anti-corrosive oils; anti-corrosive fluids; anti-rust greases and anti-rust oils, as well as anti-rust preparations for preservation; preservatives for varnishes; protective preparations for chromium (protective preparations for metals) | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 004 | Industrial greases and industrial oils, including motor, gear, compressor oils, as well as hydraulic oils; industrial oils; lubricants; lubricating oils; cutting oils; (metal) forming oils; deep hole cutting oils; grinding oils; punching oils; water-miscible coolants and non-water-miscible coolants, as well as cooling lubricants for grinding (for metal processing) (cooling oils); non-chemical additives for technical greases, technical oils; motor oils, gear oils, compressor oils and hydraulic oils, non-chemical additives for industrial oils, as well as additives, non-chemical, to motor-fuel, in particular to gasoline and diesel fuel | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2013 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | IROP | IRREGULARITY ON NOTICE OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2012 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 28, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 12, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 12, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 12, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 11, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2011 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 11, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 10, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |