USPTO serial 79093953
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Invent Umwelt- und Verfahrenstechnik AG
Erlangen, DE
Other trademarks owned by Invent Umwelt- und Verfahrenstechnik AG
Invent Umwelt- und Verfahrenstechnik AG
DE
Other trademarks owned by Invent Umwelt- und Verfahrenstechnik AG
Invent Umwelt- und Verfahrenstechnik AG
DE
Other trademarks owned by Invent Umwelt- und Verfahrenstechnik AG
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anne E. Naffziger
Anne E. Naffziger Leydig Voit & Mayer, Ltd.The Atrium Building, 1981 N. BroadwaySuite 375Walnut Creek, CA 94596| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Circulating and aeration devices, namely, hyperboloid stirring machines and machine parts in the nature of motor drives and hyperboloid stirring bodies therefore; lifting devices for stirring machines, namely, cranes; submersible motors for stirring machines; waste water and mud pumps; cranes | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Waste water purification apparatus in the nature of water dissipation devices comprising tubes, manifolds, pipes and pumps; Fillings specially adapted for use with percolating water filters consisting of pieces of rock and/or plastic and/or filling material made of porous material; Waste water treatment in the nature of waste water purification apparatus and installations; Sewage treatment plants; Equipment for mixing and aerating of waste water and return mud for biological waste water treatment, namely, waste water purification apparatus and installations comprising diffusers, blowers, perforated flexible tubes, and perforated membranes | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Services of an engineer, engineering, technological planning concerning construction of waste water treatment and sewage plants; technical engineering and computer consulting relating to the application of the aforementioned apparatuses and devices | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2022 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 6, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 1, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 23, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 10, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 19, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 19, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 27, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 19, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |