USPTO serial 79094059
TAQ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TAQ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony Tacconi
Anthony Tacconi IPCL Group PLC4860 Cox RoadSuite 200GLEN ALLEN, VA 23060Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MACHINES AND MECHANICAL APPARATUS FOR MANUFACTURING CONNECTOR DEVICES, CONNECTORS, AND CABLE SETS, NAMELY, ELECTROPNEUMATIC PROCESSING MACHINES, SEMIAUTOMATIC PROCESSING MACHINES FOR TERMINATION OF CONNECTORS IN INSULATION DISPLACEMENT TECHNIQUES, PROCESSING MACHINE FOR TERMINATION OF CRIMP CONTACT SPRINGS CONSISTING OF DRIVING MOTOR AND CRIMP TOOL, AND PNEUMATIC NOTCH PRESSES | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 008 | HAND-OPERATED TOOLS FOR MANUFACTURING AND MANIPULATING CONNECTORS AND CABLE SETS, NAMELY, MANUAL TONGS WITH RATCHETS, CUTTERS AND STRIPPERS, PULL-OFF TONGS, KNUCKLE JOINT PRESSES, CUTTERS, NOTCH PRESSES, AND NOTCH PRESSES BASED ON A KNUCKLE JOINT PRESS | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | ELECTRIC, ELECTRONIC AND ELECTROMECHANICAL APPARATUS, INSTRUMENTS, AND COMPONENTS FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVICES AND APPARATUS, NAMELY, ELECTRIC CABLES AND CONDUITS, SETS OF ELECTRIC CABLES AND CONDUITS, CONNECTORS, CONNECTING AND CONTACTING DEVICES, NAMELY, CONNECTIONS BETWEEN PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS, CONNECTIONS BETWEEN CHIP CARDS AND CHIP CARD READERS, CONNECTORS WITH INTEGRATED ELECTRONICS OR SWITCHES, MECHATRONIC ASSEMBLIES WITH INTEGRATED CONTACT ELEMENTS, JACKS, TERMINALS, IN PARTICULAR SPRING TERMINAL BLOCKS, SCREW TERMINAL BLOCKS, PLUGGABLE SCREW TERMINAL BLOCKS ON SOCKET BOARDS, PLUGGABLE TERMINAL BLOCKS ON PIN HEADERS, SWITCHES, AND ACTUATORS; JUNCTION BOXES; CONNECTORS AND PLUG CONNECTORS FOR CONNECTING CONDUCTORS WITH PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS; AND CONNECTORS AND PLUG CONNECTORS FOR CONNECTING CONDUCTORS | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 27, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 10, 2013 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Apr 20, 2013 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 16, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 15, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 2, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 2, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 1, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 30, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |