Drawing for HRMD

USPTO serial 79094364

HRMD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4097658Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 14, 2012
Examiner
KEARNEY, COLLEEN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with HRMD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bryant E. Wade/Jessica S. Sachs

Bryant E. Wade/Jessica S. Sachs Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C.5445 Corporate DriveSuite 200Troy, MI 48098

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Metalworking machines; industrial machine presses; threading machines; metalworking machines, namely, machining centers; drilling machines; grinding machines; engraving machines; machining tools for cutting away excess material from a perimeter of a machine part; pneumatic drills; electrical drills; drilling bits being parts of machines; drill chucks being parts of machines; bits being parts of lathes and milling machines; power-operated screwdrivers for machines; taps being parts of machines; lapping machines for metalworking; milling cutters for milling machinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 11, 2022NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 202271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 19, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 14, 2022ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2021REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 24, 2020RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 8, 2018NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2018C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 6, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 17, 2018ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 28, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 18, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 20, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 20, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 6, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 14, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 14, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 29, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 26, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 23, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 23, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 9, 2011NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 20, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 5, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 15, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 13, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 15, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2011CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED—
Apr 29, 2011CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 18, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 30, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 30, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 30, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 29, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 25, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance