USPTO serial 79094404
DAKOLUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4103743Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 28, 2012
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with DAKOLUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DAKO Aktiengesellschaft, Chemische Spezialprodukte
97353 Wiesentheid, DE
Other trademarks owned by DAKO Aktiengesellschaft, Chemische Spezialprodukte
DAKO Aktiengesellschaft, Chemische Spezialprodukte
97353 Wiesentheid, DE
Other trademarks owned by DAKO Aktiengesellschaft, Chemische Spezialprodukte
DAKO Aktiengesellschaft, Chemische Spezialprodukte
97353 Wiesentheid, DE
Other trademarks owned by DAKO Aktiengesellschaft, Chemische Spezialprodukte
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Leonard
Michael J. Leonard Fox Rothschild LLP997 Lenox Drive, Bldg. 3Lawrenceville, NJ 08648-2311UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | Industrial lubricants with a base of sustainable raw materials | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DAKO Aktiengesellschaft, Chemische Spezialprodukte
- Other trademarks owned by DAKO Aktiengesellschaft, Chemische Spezialprodukte
- Other trademarks owned by DAKO Aktiengesellschaft, Chemische Spezialprodukte
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Similar marks named DAKOLUB
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2022 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| May 12, 2022 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 11, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 29, 2021 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2021 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2018 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 19, 2018 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 28, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 13, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 23, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2011 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 16, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 13, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 12, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |