USPTO serial 79094540
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 18, 2021 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Aug 17, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2013 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Oct 27, 2013 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2013 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2011 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 7, 2011 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2011 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 25, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |