Drawing for DIALLERTEST

USPTO serial 79094568

DIALLERTEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4100752Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 21, 2012
Examiner
MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIALLERTEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Janet G. Ricciuti

Janet G. Ricciuti JANET GILBERT RICCIUTI, PC3735 Concord RoadDoylestown, PA 18902UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Adhesive patches for cutaneous and epicutaneous administration of allergy-causing substances for diagnosing allergies in humans and animals; patches containing allergy-causing substances for diagnosing allergies in humans and animalsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
010Medical devices in the form of applicators intended for use in applying diagnostic allergy test patches to the skin in humans and animalsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 30, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 22, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 22, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 28, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 28, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 21, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 14, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 11, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 11, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 21, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 21, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 6, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 23, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 23, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 16, 2011NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 2, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 6, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 5, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 1, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 1, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 27, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 27, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 27, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 30, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 13, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 13, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 13, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 12, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 7, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 3, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance