Drawing for ECO WARRIOR

USPTO serial 79094642

ECO WARRIOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4169711Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 10, 2012
Examiner
VALLILLO, MELISSA C
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECO WARRIOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rodney L. Skoglund

Rodney L. Skoglund Renner Kenner Greive Bobak Taylor & Weber106 South Main StreetFirst National Tower, Suite 400Akron, OH 44308

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machinery for soil working; soil moving machinery; vibrating machinery for the compacting of soil; earth moving machines; excavators being earth moving machines; grinding machinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
019Building materials, non-metallic, namely, asphalt, pitch, bitumen, concrete, cement, lime and cement aggregates; non-metallic materials for use in making and repairing pavements, namely, asphalt, pitch, bitumen, concrete, cement, lime and cement aggregates; non-metallic building materials for civil engineering, namely, asphalt, pitch, bitumen, concrete, cement, lime and cement aggregates; non-metallic building materials for ground consolidation, namely, concrete, cement, cement aggregates and limeSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
037Building construction services; construction of foundations for civil engineering structures; foundation contractor services; paving contractor services; construction consultancy servicesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
040Treatment of materials, namely, chemical treatment of soil and mechanical treatment in the nature of grinding of soil; environmental remediation services namely, soil treatment and decontamination of soil; services relating to the stabilization, compacting and consolidation of soil, namely, chemical treatment of soil and mechanical treatment in the nature of grinding of soilSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 28, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Nov 28, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 13, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Nov 5, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Nov 5, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Oct 15, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Feb 15, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jan 31, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 18, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 10, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Dec 1, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 4, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 17, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 17, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 10, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 10, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 24, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Apr 24, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 4, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 4, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 4, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Mar 19, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 19, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 1, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 28, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Feb 28, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 28, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Oct 31, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Oct 31, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 31, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 12, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 12, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 10, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 10, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 10, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 30, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 11, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 11, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 9, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 8, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Apr 4, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 4, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 31, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance