USPTO serial 79094752
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
New York, NY, US
Port Melbourne, AU
Port Melbourne, AU
Port Melbourne, AU
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Samantha M. Quimby
Samantha M. Quimby Frost Brown Todd LLC301 East Fourth Street3300 Great American TowerCincinnati, OH 43202| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | [ Non-medicated skin care and hair care preparations; cosmetics; make-up kits comprised of lipstick, lip gloss, lip liner, foundation, facial powder, eye shadow, mascara and eye liner; essential oils; oils for cosmetic purposes; all of the aforesaid containing chia or ingredients derived from chia ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 005 | [ Food for babies; nutritional additives for medical purposes used in foods and dietary supplements for human consumption; medicinal oils; dietetic foods and beverages adapted for medical use; all of the aforesaid containing chia or ingredients derived from chia ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 029 | Dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; yoghurt; [ milk; flavoured milk; milk products, namely, evaporated milk, milk proteins and solids; dairy smoothies; cheese; ] edible oils; [ margarine; ] processed edible seeds; all of the aforesaid containing chia or ingredients derived from chia | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | [ Bread and bread products, namely, breadsticks, breads, buns, bagels, wraps, flat breads, pita breads; confectionary, namely, sugar confectionary, chocolate confectionary, namely, candies; bakery products; biscuits, crackers, bagel chips, pita chips, flour-based and grain-based chips; cereal and cereal products, namely, rolled oats, granola, ready-to-eat cereal-derived food bars, flour, processed bran; beverages containing tea, coffee and cocoa, namely, beverages made of tea, beverages with a tea base, coffee based beverages, prepared coffee and coffee-based beverages, cocoa-based beverages; flour for food; snack foods, namely, bagel chips, pita chips, taco chips, tortilla chips, frozen prepared meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; sauces, namely, tomato-based sauces, vegetable based sauces, lentil-based sauces, soya sauces, teriyaki sauces, stir fry sauces, black bean sauces, barbeque sauces, seafood based sauces, poultry based sauces, meat based sauces, pork based sauces, cheese sauces, marinade sauces; spices; ice; all of the aforesaid containing chia or ingredients derived from chia ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 031 | [ Pet food; seeds, namely, grass seeds, bird seeds; additives for fodder, not for medical purposes; foodstuffs for animals; all of the aforesaid containing chia or ingredients derived from chia ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | [ Flavoured water, non-flavoured still and sparkling water; beer; vegetable juices; fruit juice beverages; all of the aforesaid containing chia or ingredients derived from chia ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2023 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2023 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2023 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 23, 2023 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 23, 2022 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Aug 14, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 12, 2020 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Dec 4, 2020 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 18, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 18, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2015 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | RHRD | RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | DCPN | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 20, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 30, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 13, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Sep 23, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 28, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 13, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 23, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |