USPTO serial 79094754
TWALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TWALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Body-building apparatus; parlour games; gymnastic apparatus; manually-operated exercise equipment for physical fitness purposes; interactive wall (exercise equipment for physical fitness purpose); games, namely memory games, party games, card games, puzzle games (do not include crossword puzzles in this class), tabletop games, action skill games, action target games, arcade games, board games, coin-operated video games, dart games; apparatus for electronic games other than those adapted for use with an external display screen or monitor, floor-standing units for playing electronic games other than in conjunction with a television or computer | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 10, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2011 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |