USPTO serial 79094977
TULIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4200488Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 4, 2012
- Examiner
- CARL III, FRED
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with TULIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Danish Crown Foods Germany GmbH
Hamburg, DE
DK
DK
DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Shannon Marie McKeon
Shannon Marie McKeon Dykema Gossett PLLC1301 K Str., N.W., Suite 1100Washington, DC 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Fresh and preserved meat, namely, pork, luncheon meat and salami | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Danish Crown Foods Germany GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Tulip Food Company P/S
- Other trademarks owned by Tulip Food Company P/S
- Other trademarks owned by TULIP Food Company GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named TULIP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2022 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 8, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 12, 2020 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 8, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2018 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2018 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 29, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 6, 2018 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 30, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 9, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 29, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 30, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 30, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 30, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 15, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 14, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 11, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 1, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 1, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 1, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 18, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |