Drawing for CLAREFLECT

USPTO serial 79095179

CLAREFLECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4211997Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 25, 2012
Examiner
MARTIN, LIEF ANDREW
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLAREFLECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Theodore D. Lienesch

Theodore D. Lienesch Thompson Hine LLP10050 Innovation WaySuite 400Dayton, OH 45342-4934

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Paper, cardboard; printed matter, namely, magazines, leaflets, journals, brochures, manuals, books, and informational flyers, in the field of packaging and lamination products; bookbinding material; photographs; stationery; adhesive tape for packaging, wrapping and binding, for household and stationery purposes; printed instructional and teaching material in the field of packaging and lamination productsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
017Plastics, namely, cellulose acetate in the form of films, sheets, pellicles, rolls, or narrow reels, for further manufacture as industrial or commercial packaging, for use in the manufacture of overlaminating for printed or unprinted paper, for use in the manufacture of pressure sensitive tapes and labels, or for use in the manufacture of storage media for photographic material, optoelectric components, laser and digital printing materials, and insulation; semi-processed plastics, namely, polyvinyl alcohol in the form of films, sheets, membranes, rolls or narrow reels, for use in the manufacture of industrial or commercial packaging lamination film; metalized lamination film, namely, metalized plastic barrier films used as packaging for food, drink, cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, perfume, liquor and tobacco and used as industrial or commercial non-food packing; sheets of plastics, namely, semi-processed plastics in sheet form for further manufactureSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
020Display boards, signboards of plastics, placards of plasticsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Nov 2, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 21, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jan 23, 2020INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jan 23, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Dec 26, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Apr 26, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Sep 25, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
May 14, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 19, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 19, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Dec 25, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 25, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 22, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 10, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jul 10, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 20, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jun 20, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 20, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jun 1, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 30, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 30, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
May 30, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
May 30, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
May 30, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
May 21, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 21, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 21, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 21, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 14, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 1, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 21, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 13, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 22, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 22, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 22, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 21, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Apr 15, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 15, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 14, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance