USPTO serial 79095200
Z CHROMOZOME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4251968Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 4, 2012
- Examiner
- EINSTEIN, MATTHEW T
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Z CHROMOZOME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey M. Liebenson
Jeffrey M. Liebenson Liebenson Law303 Mercer Street, Suite C-102New York, NY 10003UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Blank compact discs and DVDs; apparatus for recording and reproducing sounds, images, signals and data | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Education, namely providing seminars and workshops in the field of visual arts, film production, stage production and scriptwriting; entertainment in the nature of production and distribution of stage productions, dance performances and live visual and audio performances by actors, musical bands, dancers; videotaping, film production; scriptwriting services; organizing sporting and cultural activities | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 21, 2020 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 21, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 5, 2020 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 5, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Oct 30, 2015 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 18, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 29, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 13, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 2, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 13, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 4, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 18, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 18, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 17, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |