USPTO serial 79095219
ULTIMATETROUGH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, LIEF ANDREW
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ULTIMATETROUGH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Apparatus and instruments for conducting, switching, transforming, accumulating,regulating or controlling electricity, namely, electric accumulators, electric actuators,adapters; solar energy collectors in the nature of photovoltaic cells for electricity generation; photovoltaic solar modules for electricity generation; parabolic mirrors for concentrating light beams; solar batteries | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Apparatus for heating, steam generating, cooking, refrigerating, drying, ventilating and water supply, in particular solar thermal installations; solar collectors for heating; solar thermal modules for heat generation; solar thermal collectors | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Building construction installation and repair, in particular of solar thermal installations and photovoltaic installations, in particular solar thermal power stations | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Architectural consultation; consultancy relating to energy conservation technology; technical project studies, in particular studies concerning solar thermal power stations; engineering; providing information relating to science and technology, namely, technological information in the field of alternative energy generation; industrial analysis and research services, namely, services in connection with construction of energy production installations, in particular solar thermal and photovoltaic installations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 2, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 28, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 9, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |