USPTO serial 79095357
PASCULLI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4853059Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 17, 2015
- Examiner
- STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PASCULLI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Berlin, DE
DE
Christoph Hartmann and Maik Kresse
Berlin, DE
Other trademarks owned by Christoph Hartmann and Maik Kresse
Christoph Hartmann and Maik Kresse
Berlin, DE
Other trademarks owned by Christoph Hartmann and Maik Kresse
Christoph Hartmann and Maik Kresse
Berlin, DE
Other trademarks owned by Christoph Hartmann and Maik Kresse
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Tricycles; bicycle stands and wheel stabilisers being structural parts of bicycles and wheels all sold as integral single units; bicycle brakes; bicycles; bicycle rims; bicycle parts, namely, forks; bicycle bells; bicycle chains; bicycle horns; baskets adapted for bicycles; bicycle handlebars; bicycle wheel hubs; bicycle pedals; bicycle pumps; bicycle wheels; bicycle frames; bicycle tyres; bicycle saddles; bicycle wheel inner tubes; bicycle wheel spokes; panniers bags for bicycles; bicycle parts, namely, handle bar stems; inner tube repair kit consisting primarily of patches for repairing inner tubes; panniers adapted for cycles; casings for pneumatic tyres; axles as land vehicle parts; inner tubes for vehicle tyres; tubeless bicycle tyres; mudguards for bicycles; spoke tighteners for bicycles | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Suits; bathing suits; bathing trunks; bath robes; bathing caps; bathing sandals; bathing slippers; bandanas; bodysuits; mittens; belts; gloves; shirts; trousers; jackets; knitted jerseys; headgear, namely, hats, caps and visors; leather apparel, namely, leather jackets and leather gloves; cap peaks; pullovers; cyclists wear, namely, shorts, cycling bib shorts for men and women, shoes and shirts; socks; sweaters; T-shirts; knitted garments, namely, shirts, pants and jackets; jerseys; overcoats; underwear; sportswear, namely, shirts, pants and shorts | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 039 | Travel booking, namely, making reservations and bookings for transportation; reservation and booking of seats for travel; travel guide services; organisation of travels | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pasculli Holding GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Bikeline GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Christoph Hartmann and Maik Kresse
- Other trademarks owned by Christoph Hartmann and Maik Kresse
- Other trademarks owned by Christoph Hartmann and Maik Kresse
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named PASCULLI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2023 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2023 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2023 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 3, 2023 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 18, 2020 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 6, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2016 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2016 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 4, 2015 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 12, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2015 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2015 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2014 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | RGRR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 22, 2013 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | RDX2 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2013 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 13, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 12, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 19, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2012 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 13, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 24, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 23, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |