USPTO serial 79095387
MAGCAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAGCAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | scientific, nautical, surveying, photographic, cinematographic, optical, weighing, measuring, signaling, supervision checking, life-saving and teaching apparatus and instruments, namely, cameras; apparatus and instruments for conducting, switching, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling electricity, namely, electrical conductors, electrical switches, transformers, electric accumulators, and electrical controllers; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; prerecorded magnetic data carriers featuring computer software and documents related to cameras, recording discs, namely, optical discs featuring computer software and documents related to cameras; automatic vending machines and mechanisms for coin-operated apparatus; cash registers, calculating machines, data processing equipment and computers; fire-extinguishing apparatus | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | scientific services, namely, scientific laboratory services; scientific research and development; technological services, namely, research and design in the field of cameras; technological research in the field of cameras; technological design, namely, design for others of cameras; industrial analysis, namely, analysis of industrial fluids; industrial research services in the field of cameras and computer hardware and software; design and development of computer hardware and software | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 24, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 19, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 4, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 29, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 29, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 7, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 16, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 11, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 20, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 17, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 16, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |