Drawing for NANOCASTER

USPTO serial 79095528

NANOCASTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4208261Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 18, 2012
Examiner
VENGROFF, MARILYN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NANOCASTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

H. Matthew Horlacher

H. MATTHEW HORLACHER HOLLAND & HART LLP222 S MAIN ST STE 2200SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101-2194UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Equipment for mobile and stationary real-time conversion and recording of audio and/or video signals for different target formats in current or later distribution over IP networks, namely, video recorders, audio recorders, computer hardware; mobile SD (Security Digital)/HD (High Definition) video encoder allowing automated video transmission via the InternetSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
038Providing access to a global computer network; providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network; broadcasting of television; broadcasting of radio programs; broadcasting of cable television; communication through fiber-optic networks; communication via computer terminals; telecommunications routing and junction services; television broadcasting; satellite transmission; provision of telecommunications channels for teleshopping services; teleconferencing services; rental of access time to global computer networks; providing access to databasesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
041Digital imaging services; electronic desktop publication; photo editing; television and radio programming scheduling; rental of movie camera equipment and film camera accessories; film production; in studio film production; photography; organization and holding of conferences in the field of film and photography; organization and holding of congresses in the field of film and photography; editing of videotapes; providing a web-based system and online portal for participation in online gaming; rental of sound recordings; operation of sound recording studios; teaching and education, namely, classes, seminars, workshops in the field of film and photography; scriptwriting; drafting of texts other than advertising texts; rental of camcorders; leasing of film camera equipment; renting of video cameras; recording of video tapes; video film production; timing for sports events; news reporters servicesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
042Updating of computer software; computer hardware and software consulting services; restoration of computer data; installing computer programs; copying of computer programs; design of computer software; rental of computer software; maintenance of computer software; computer software consultancy; computer system analysis; designing and developing of computer programming; rental of computers; computer system design; converting of computer programs and data; converting data or documents from physical to electronic media; rental of web servers; the creation and maintenance of websites for third partiesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 22, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Nov 22, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 14, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jan 22, 2020INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jan 22, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Jan 18, 2020INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE
Dec 19, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Apr 19, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Sep 18, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Apr 16, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 23, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Mar 23, 2013FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Dec 18, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 1, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 18, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 3, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jul 3, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 13, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jun 13, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 13, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
May 29, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 24, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 22, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 27, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 26, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 26, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 30, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 8, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 6, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 25, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 25, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jan 25, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Dec 13, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 13, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Nov 25, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 25, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 25, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 29, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 29, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 29, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 28, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Apr 22, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 22, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 21, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance