USPTO serial 79095528
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
85774 Unterföhring, DE
85774 Unterföhring, DE
85774 Unterföhring, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
H. Matthew Horlacher
H. MATTHEW HORLACHER HOLLAND & HART LLP222 S MAIN ST STE 2200SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101-2194UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Equipment for mobile and stationary real-time conversion and recording of audio and/or video signals for different target formats in current or later distribution over IP networks, namely, video recorders, audio recorders, computer hardware; mobile SD (Security Digital)/HD (High Definition) video encoder allowing automated video transmission via the Internet | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Providing access to a global computer network; providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network; broadcasting of television; broadcasting of radio programs; broadcasting of cable television; communication through fiber-optic networks; communication via computer terminals; telecommunications routing and junction services; television broadcasting; satellite transmission; provision of telecommunications channels for teleshopping services; teleconferencing services; rental of access time to global computer networks; providing access to databases | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Digital imaging services; electronic desktop publication; photo editing; television and radio programming scheduling; rental of movie camera equipment and film camera accessories; film production; in studio film production; photography; organization and holding of conferences in the field of film and photography; organization and holding of congresses in the field of film and photography; editing of videotapes; providing a web-based system and online portal for participation in online gaming; rental of sound recordings; operation of sound recording studios; teaching and education, namely, classes, seminars, workshops in the field of film and photography; scriptwriting; drafting of texts other than advertising texts; rental of camcorders; leasing of film camera equipment; renting of video cameras; recording of video tapes; video film production; timing for sports events; news reporters services | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Updating of computer software; computer hardware and software consulting services; restoration of computer data; installing computer programs; copying of computer programs; design of computer software; rental of computer software; maintenance of computer software; computer software consultancy; computer system analysis; designing and developing of computer programming; rental of computers; computer system design; converting of computer programs and data; converting data or documents from physical to electronic media; rental of web servers; the creation and maintenance of websites for third parties | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 18, 2020 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 19, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 18, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 3, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 13, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 24, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 22, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 13, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 25, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 25, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |