Drawing for DFS DUAL FEED SYSTEM

USPTO serial 79095542

DFS DUAL FEED SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4040434Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 18, 2011
Examiner
TOOLEY, DAVID E
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DFS DUAL FEED SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Raymond Rundelli

Raymond Rundelli Calfee, Halter & Griswold1405 East Sixth StreetThe Calfee BuildingCleveland, OH 44114-1607

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Component feature of sewing and quilting machines, namely, a fabric feederSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Nov 7, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Mar 15, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Feb 4, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Feb 4, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Jan 25, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
May 25, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Dec 29, 2017LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Nov 17, 2017RHRDRESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED
Oct 18, 2016REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Aug 21, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 21, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 17, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 17, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 15, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 30, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 30, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jan 18, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 18, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 2, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Aug 2, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 30, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 30, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 14, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 14, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 4, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 26, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 25, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 20, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 20, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 4, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 4, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 4, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 3, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 26, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Apr 22, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 22, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 21, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance