USPTO serial 79095564
EASY TCA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SEVERSON, KAREN
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EASY TCA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Oct 6, 2018 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 25, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 3, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 3, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 3, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 2, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |