USPTO serial 79095682
REINZOSIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4192414Status 707Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 21, 2012
- Examiner
- CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
- Law office
- —
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with REINZOSIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
89233 Neu-Ulm, DE
89233 Neu-Ulm, DE
89233 Neu-Ulm, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dorne McKinnon-Rybicki
Dorne McKinnon-Rybicki McCoy Russell LLP1410 NW Johnson St., Suite 201Portland, OR 97209UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | [ Chemicals for use in industry, unprocessed artificial resins, unprocessed plastics; Industrial adhesives ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | Sealing materials, namely, liquid sealing compounds in the nature of general purpose silicon rubber sealants for use in the automotive field | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Reinz Dichtungs-GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Reinz Dichtungs-GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Reinz Dichtungs-GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named REINZOSIL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2024 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2024 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2024 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 9, 2024 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 9, 2023 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2023 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 23, 2023 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2021 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jul 30, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 8, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 23, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 1, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 5, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 30, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 13, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 1, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 20, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 24, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |